PG Soft publishes a return-to-player figure for every title here, and unlike Pragmatic it appears to ship each game in a single fixed configuration rather than three. What it does not do is show that figure to a visitor: the field on its own game pages renders as a blank dash, and the number sits in the data the page is built from. There are 8 pages below.
Everything in this section
| Title | Published RTP | Max win | Ways to win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahjong Ways | 96.92% | 25000x | 1,024 ways to win |
| Mahjong Ways 2 | 96.95% | 100000x | 2,000 ways to win, up from 1,024 in the original |
| Fortune Tiger | 96.81% | 2500x | 5 |
| Fortune Ox | 96.75% | 2000x | 10 |
| Lucky Neko | 96.73% | 100000x | up to 32,400 ways to win, from 40 base paylines expanding to 85 in free spins |
| Treasures of Aztec | 96.71% | Not published | up to 32,400 ways to win |
| Wild Bandito | 96.73% | 25000x | 1,024 ways to win |
| Wild Bounty Showdown | 96.75% | 5000x | 3,000 ways to win |
8 pages, each one covering a single entry rather than summarising several. Where a field above reads “not published”, the entry’s own page explains who would have had to publish it.
Each entry in a paragraph
Enough on each to know which page is the one worth opening.
Mahjong Ways
A 5-reel ways-to-win slot on 5 reels and 4 rows, 1,024 ways to win, released 2019. Built around a free-spins multiplier that rises with each cascade and never falls back during the round.
Published RTP 96.92%, maximum win 25000x, described as medium volatility.
Mahjong Ways 2
A 5-reel ways-to-win slot on 5 reels and 4 rows, 2,000 ways to win, up from 1,024 in the original, released 2020. Built around a published maximum of 100,000x on a game labelled medium volatility, which is an unusual pairing.
Published RTP 96.95%, maximum win 100000x, described as medium volatility.
Fortune Tiger
A 3x3 slot on 3 reels and 3 rows, with 5 paylines, released 2022. Built around a 3x3 grid with five lines, which is about as small as a modern slot gets.
Published RTP 96.81%, maximum win 2500x, described as medium volatility.
Fortune Ox
A 3-reel slot on 3 reels and 3-4-3 rows, with 10 paylines, released 2021. Built around an irregular 3-4-3 grid, where the middle reel is a row taller than the outer two.
Published RTP 96.75%, maximum win 2000x, described as medium volatility.
Lucky Neko
A 6-reel ways-to-win slot on 6 reels and 5 rows, up to 32,400 ways to win, from 40 base paylines expanding to 85 in free spins, released 2021. Built around oversized symbol blocks up to 6x6 that occupy the entire grid as one symbol.
Published RTP 96.73%, maximum win 100000x, described as medium volatility.
Treasures of Aztec
A 6-reel ways-to-win slot on 6 reels and 5 rows, up to 32,400 ways to win, released 2020. Built around a multiplier that climbs twice as fast inside free spins as it does outside them.
Published RTP 96.71%, and no maximum win is quoted here, described as medium volatility.
Wild Bandito
A 5-reel ways-to-win slot on 5 reels and 4 rows, 1,024 ways to win, released 2022. Built around free-spins multipliers that persist for the entire round rather than resetting between spins.
Published RTP 96.73%, maximum win 25000x, described as high volatility.
Wild Bounty Showdown
A 6-reel ways-to-win slot on 6 reels and 3-4-5-5-4-3 rows, 3,000 ways to win, released 2022. Built around a diamond-shaped grid that is three symbols tall at the edges and five in the middle.
Published RTP 96.75%, maximum win 5000x, described as high volatility.
The thing most often got wrong here
The correct phrasing for any figure on these pages is “per PG Soft’s published game data”, not “as shown on PG Soft’s page”. A reader who opens the official page to check will find a dash where the RTP should be.
The figures are real — every one matched independent consensus for the same title, which is strong evidence the data is current rather than stale. But a site claiming the number is visible on PG Soft’s page is telling the reader something they can disprove in one click, and that is a worse outcome than not quoting it at all.
Checking any of this without trusting this site
Checking a PG Soft figure takes one more step than checking a Pragmatic one, because the visible page does not carry it:
- Open the title’s page on pgsoft.com. Note that the RTP field renders as a dash — this is expected, and it is why the phrasing on these pages is “published game data” rather than “shown on the page”.
- Compare the figure here against two independent aggregators. Agreement across both is what this site treated as confirmation that the underlying data is real and current.
- Check the grid shape against the way-count. Several of these titles are irregular — Fortune Ox runs 3-4-3 and Wild Bounty Showdown runs 3-4-5-5-4-3 — and a flat “reels by rows” description misstates the paytable.
- Treat Treasures of Aztec’s maximum win as unsettled. PG Soft’s own data gives 100,000x as a maximum exposure while independent simulation puts a practical maximum near 9,071x, and those may be measuring different things.
What this section does not cover
Nothing here rates these games against each other, and no operator is claimed to carry them. Where two sources disagree by an order of magnitude on a maximum win, as they do for Treasures of Aztec, the figure is left out rather than settled by preference.
That omission is deliberate and it is the same on every page in this section. A site that fills those gaps with plausible numbers reads better and is worth less.
FAQ
Does PG Soft publish RTP on its website?
It publishes the figure in the data its server sends with each game page, but the visible field renders as a blank dash. The number is studio-sourced; it is just not on screen.
Do PG Soft titles ship in multiple RTP configurations like Pragmatic's?
No evidence of that was found for any of the titles here. Each appears to ship with a single fixed figure, which makes a quoted PG Soft RTP more directly meaningful than a quoted Pragmatic one.
Are these titles available at BOSS77?
Unconfirmed. No BOSS77 lobby was reachable during research, so no claim is made about its catalogue.
What separates Mahjong Ways from Mahjong Ways 2?
The way-count almost doubles from 1,024 to 2,000, the cascade becomes an avalanche, and the published maximum rises from 25,000x to 100,000x. The RTP barely moves, from 96.92% to 96.95%, which means the extra headroom is paid for out of how rarely it is reached.
Why is Treasures of Aztec's maximum win left blank?
Because PG Soft's own data field gives 100,000x while independent simulation of the game's mathematics puts a practical maximum near 9,071x. Those may be measuring different things — a certified ceiling against a modelled outcome — and picking either would misrepresent the other.
What does a 100,000x maximum win on a medium-volatility game mean?
Usually that the maximum is an accounting ceiling rather than a realistic outcome. A medium volatility label describes results that cluster; a 100,000x ceiling describes an event far outside that cluster. Both can be true at once, and the label is the more useful of the two.