Wagering requirement has a precise meaning, and the imprecise version of it is what causes most of the confusion around it.
Wagering requirement (also called playthrough or turnover) — The multiple of a bonus that must be wagered before any of it can be withdrawn.
What Wagering requirement actually means
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Term | Wagering requirement |
| Written out | also called playthrough or turnover |
| In one line | The multiple of a bonus that must be wagered before any of it can be withdrawn. |
| Fixed by | The operator, in its bonus terms — not the studio |
| Where you meet it | Bonus terms and conditions |
A bonus carrying 30x wagering on a ₱100 credit requires ₱3,000 of qualifying wagers before a withdrawal is permitted. Games usually contribute at different rates: slots often count fully, while table games may count a fraction or nothing at all. The multiple, the weighting, the maximum stake permitted while wagering and the expiry window together decide what an offer is worth.
The common misreading
Wagering is widely read as ‘deposit this much’. It is turnover, not deposit, and the same money is counted repeatedly as it is staked. It is also frequently assumed that the headline multiple is the whole condition, when the weighting and the stake cap often matter more.
A wagering requirement is not a fee and not a deposit condition. It is a turnover condition, and it applies to the bonus, sometimes to the deposit alongside it, and occasionally to winnings derived from it. Which of the three is specified in the terms, not the headline.
Using it in practice
The multiple alone does not tell you the cost. Check the game weighting, the maximum stake while wagering, and the expiry window — any of the three can make a headline offer unusable, and the stake cap in particular is often what makes clearing it impractical. It is easier to hold onto alongside free spins and how bankroll management works, which the same pages tend to mention in the same breath.
Terms like Wagering requirement run through the game pages on this site, and where the studio does not publish the figure behind one, those pages say so instead of quoting a number from a comparison site. That is why several spec tables here carry blanks.
A worked example
₱3,000 of turnover on a 96% RTP game carries an expected loss of about ₱120 before the bonus can be withdrawn. Against a ₱100 bonus, the expected value of clearing it is already negative — and that is before any game-weighting rule that makes some of that turnover count for less than face value.
FAQ
Is Wagering requirement something a casino can change?
Not on this site's evidence. Where a value behind wagering requirement is set by the game's own mathematics, it belongs to the studio rather than the operator, and where a studio does not publish it, no outside source can confirm it either.
What does Wagering requirement mean?
The multiple of a bonus that must be wagered before any of it can be withdrawn.
What do people get wrong about Wagering requirement?
Wagering is widely read as 'deposit this much'. It is turnover, not deposit, and the same money is counted repeatedly as it is staked. It is also frequently assumed that the headline multiple is the whole condition, when the weighting and the stake cap often matter more.